The tension between China and the U.S. has escalated!

Facing the US’s step-by-step pressure on China, we China want to break through the strategic dilemma and solve the Taiwan issue as soon as possible. We must dare to play cards and draw red lines in the following sixteen aspects, and accurately convey our firm determination and strong strength in a way that they can understand and understand.

Question #1:   What if the US militarily intervenes when China reunifies Taiwan by force, or even strikes mainland targets?

Answer:  Once the US militarily intervenes to interfere with the reunification of Taiwan by force, or even strikes mainland targets, military strikes, whether from the US mainland or from the Asia-Pacific military base, are equivalent to the US and China going to war, and the US mainland will inevitably be hit by China’s military. In addition, the US strikes China’s military forces, no matter which US military base in Asia-Pacific it is launched from, it is equivalent to the country directly fighting with China, and both the country and the US mainland will be hit by China’s military.

Question #2:   The US has always tasted the sweetness of fighting proxy wars. In order to hinder the rise of mainland China and interfere with the liberation of Taiwan, the US may launch proxy wars around China, causing capital to flee from the turbulent Asia-Pacific, especially China, and make the US once again a safe haven for capital. What should China do?

Answer:  If the US instigates Asia-Pacific countries to create chaos around China, or even wage war on China, China knows that it is a trap and has to drill in, knowing that it is a fire pit and has to jump in. China has the military strength to deal with all armed provocations from neighboring countries, and to give a head-on blow to the provocateurs who do not listen to persuasion. The US does not start the Asia-Pacific military base to intervene, once the US military intervenes, launches an attack on China’s mainland, the US mainland will inevitably be attacked by China. It will never let the US become a safe haven for capital again, realizing its dream of making others fight and bleed, and making war wealth for itself.

Question #3:   What if some neighboring countries are instigated or instructed by the US, take advantage of the opportunity of China’s liberation of Taiwan, provoke incidents on the periphery, and occupy China’s territory?

Answer:   Before China launches the war to liberate Taiwan, it must make clear demands on certain neighboring countries: when China encounters war, any country that takes advantage of the fire to rob and infringe on China’s territory will be strongly counterattacked by China, even if it is inconvenient to fight in multiple directions at the time and temporarily endure it, afterwards it must pay back at double the price. At any time, China’s territory cannot lose an inch, and it is advised that some countries must not be bewitched by the US and give up the idea of robbing China in danger.

Question #4:   One of China’s nuclear policies is not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear countries. The US may exploit the loopholes in China’s nuclear policy and gather several non-nuclear countries around to gang up on China. China’s conventional forces cannot cope, what should we do?

Answer:   Under normal circumstances, China will definitely adhere to not using nuclear weapons against non-nuclear countries. But under the manipulation of the US, when the surrounding and US allies gang up on China and the intention to deplete China is obvious, the nature completely changes, and the rules must also change accordingly. China can adjust policies in a timely manner according to the international situation and the war situation at the front through the authorization of the National People’s Congress, and ensure our national security and national interests with resolute actions and thunderous counterattacks. In a word, as a nuclear power with strong military strength, China will definitely not lose as long as it takes up arms, and it will not allow losing!

Question #5:   The US currently controls sixteen major sea transport channels. Once China and the US show their cards militarily, what should China do if the US chokes China’s sea energy transport channel?

Answer:   We can proudly say that through years of continuous efforts and layout, the problem of China’s energy channel being controlled by the US has been greatly improved. We can rely on land channels such as Russia, Central Asia, and the Middle East, as well as Pakistan’s Gwadar Port, Myanmar’s Kyaukpyu Port, and domestic energy production and reserves, to fully support the war and guarantee basic people’s livelihood. At the same time, we can also use the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait to counteract the energy and material transportation of the US. The US’s plot to dissolve China’s war potential by choking the sea channel has become history, and the US’s uncontrolled behavior at sea without China’s countermeasures has also become history.

Question #6:   The US does not allow China to export weapons and equipment to Russia, and even dual-use products are not allowed, but the US sells weapons to Taiwan, China. How should China respond?

Answer:   This is a major and realistic issue for China to oppose US double standards and US hegemony. The US does not allow China to provide military aid to Russia, but provides weapons to Taiwan, China. We must break this hegemony, domineering, and bullying behavior. We can clearly tell the US that as long as the US provides weapons to Taiwan, we can provide weapons and equipment of corresponding value to any other country that is hostile to the US, including Russia. This point is very important, this point must be done!

Question #7:   The U.S. threatened that if China tried to reunify Taiwan by resorting to force, it would destroy Taiwan’s semiconductor manufacturer TSMC. What will China do if that happens?

Answer:   or even Taiwan itself is mere bluster. While TSMC dominates the global market for advanced chips (especially those below 7 nanometers), over 60% of its production serves US clients. Under US pressure, TSMC has ceased producing high-end chips for China. If the US were to destroy TSMC, it would significantly impact global chip supply, especially for the US, but would have minimal effect on mainland China. Nevertheless, China must assert that Taiwan is part of its territory, and any attack on Taiwan is an attack on China itself, warranting a response.

Question #8:   US Nuclear Superiority and China’s Resolve: 

Answer:   The question isn’t about willingness or courage; it’s about China having no other choice due to US actions. While China’s nuclear capabilities lag behind the US, it still possesses a formidable deterrent. China’s triad of nuclear forces may not match the US’s, but it can retaliate effectively. China has faced adversity before and emerged stronger. In the context of reunifying Taiwan, China could consider leasing strategic nuclear weapons from Russia to maintain balance.

Question #9:    Potential Setbacks Due to US Sanctions: China’s reunification with Taiwan is essential for its rejuvenation. While US sanctions could inconvenience China, its resilience and self-sufficiency would mitigate the impact. Once unified, external constraints on China’s rejuvenation would diminish, and China’s confidence in its strong manufacturing base remains unwavering.

Question #10: Can China win in its confrontation with the United States, given the current strength and international influence of the U.S., including its alliance?

Answers:   When facing U.S. pressure, China has consistently adopted a stance of endurance, aiming to give the U.S. an opportunity for reflection and change. The fundamental principle is that “cooperation benefits both, while conflict harms both.” However, the U.S. often interprets China’s patience and forbearance as weakness to exploit. For China, it’s not merely about containment but rather a matter of how far the U.S. intends to push. There comes a point where patience runs out, and further endurance becomes unnecessary. In the current confrontation between China and the U.S., the focus isn’t solely on winning; it’s about the stark reality that submission to the U.S. would be akin to surrendering. Taking a determined stand against the U.S. might lead to a better world—a more equal, free, and democratic global order.

While the U.S. does indeed possess comprehensive strength greater than China’s, especially when combined with its alliance, we must recognize that their power isn’t as invincible as they claim. First, China isn’t challenging Western core interests; rather, it’s the U.S. provoking China’s core interests at every turn. China’s actions are defensive and just. Second, many countries within the U.S.-led alliance act out of necessity, not genuine alignment. If the U.S. hegemony were dismantled, several nations might break free from its control and even side with China against the U.S.

If the outcome of the China-U.S. rivalry results in mutual harm, Japan—the biggest beneficiary—could seize the opportunity to rise again and seek retribution for the two atomic bombs dropped by the U.S. If the U.S. doesn’t change its current behavior of wielding hegemony and bullying, its eventual decline will be marked by a grim fate. This point must be made clear to the U.S.

Question #11:   The U.S. has erected barriers in high-tech areas like chip manufacturing to curb China’s rise and prevent military action against Taiwan. What should China do?

Answer:   Despite being at a disadvantage, China isn’t without countermeasures. The economic and technological ties between China and the U.S. are intricate. China can target U.S. vulnerabilities. For instance, controlling the raw materials needed for U.S. high-tech production sends a stern warning. China’s recent export controls on germanium and gallium are just the beginning. As for future moves, it depends on the U.S.'s actions.

Question #12:   Japan has repeatedly claimed that Taiwan’s situation affects Japan. What if Japan decides to militarily defend Taiwan?

Answer:   Japan’s involvement in defending Taiwan would be futile—a case of grasping at straws. If Japan dares to intervene militarily in China’s reunification with Taiwan, its entire mainland would become a target for Chinese military strikes. Such actions would reignite new and old grievances among the Chinese people. The inevitable result would be a united front against Japan, settling both past and present scores.

Question #13:   Western countries have repeatedly accused China of having opaque military capabilities and consider China’s nuclear development a threat to the world. How does China view this?

Answer:   We can clearly tell the West: It’s precisely because there are wolves in the global village that China must prepare a hunting rifle! China’s military development aims to safeguard territorial integrity and national security. Developing nuclear capabilities is essential to counter the U.S.'s nuclear threats and coercion. While the U.S. possesses nuclear strength nearly twenty times that of China, claiming that China poses a threat to the world implies that the U.S. threat is twentyfold.

Question 14:   If China and the U.S. fully confront each other over Taiwan, and the U.S., like it did with Russia, seizes China’s U.S. debt and overseas assets, potentially wiping out decades of Chinese wealth, shouldn’t China be afraid?

Answer:   There’s no need to fear this scenario. Over the past few decades of reform and opening up, China has deeply integrated into the world. China shares intertwined interests with many countries, including the U.S. If the West were to seize China’s U.S. debt and overseas assets like bandits, China could respond in two ways: First, China could reciprocate by seizing assets of those countries within its borders. Second, China could sternly warn countries considering following the U.S. that seizing Chinese assets would have severe consequences. After Taiwan’s reunification, China could pursue these countries for repayment, including interest and additional costs.

China firmly believes that reunifying Taiwan makes it the ultimate victor. History and reality favor the victor. Most countries are unlikely to defy historical trends by siding with the U.S.

Question 15:   China is a major global trading nation. If the U.S. kicks China out of the SWIFT dollar settlement system, would China suffer worse than Russia under sanctions?

Answer:   China is the largest trading partner for over 120 countries. Its robust manufacturing capacity provides essential goods worldwide. The U.S. cannot alter this reality. While exclusion from SWIFT might cause temporary inconvenience and losses for China, in the long term, it would accelerate China’s efforts to promote the Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS) and internationalize the yuan.

China’s Belt and Road Initiative continues to progress, and more countries settle in yuan and sign bilateral currency swap agreements, strengthening China’s resilience against U.S. sanctions. The U.S. cannot fully defeat Russia, nor can it fully defeat China. Using the dollar as a weapon against China will ultimately harm the U.S. itself. History will once again prove that the U.S. is shooting itself in the foot!

Question 16:   Foreign media claims that China’s large-scale military exercises seem to be losing their deterrent effect. They haven’t deterred Taiwan and the U.S., and both sides have intensified their actions. The situation is embarrassing for mainland China. Is there no solution?

Answer:   Currently, Taiwan separatists, driven by U.S. support, have become increasingly extreme. The U.S. plays the “Taiwan card” with audacity. As the saying goes, “Whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad.” Mainland China’s determination to reunify Taiwan remains unshakable. Stubborn Taiwan separatists will face historical judgment. When the time comes, mainland China will issue red warrants for these separatists worldwide.

Mainland China’s current approach—deterrence without direct action—sends a clear signal to the U.S. and Taiwan authorities: China has the capability and resolve to resolve the Taiwan issue through force. However, mainland China provides a final chance for peace. Once that goodwill is exhausted, decisive action will follow.

Lastly, let’s recall two statements from China’s great leader, Chairman Mao: “This is our sincere advice as Communists; do not say we didn’t warn you!” and “The Chinese people are now organized and cannot be trifled with. If provoked, it won’t end well!” [4]